android - Is there any way to differentiate "Normal Purchase" from "Promo code purchase"? -

-

i have inapp products android app. when inapp product purchased, checking

  1. purchase bundle of product id - tells purchase successful.
  2. developerpayload validation - tells purchase data recieved valid.

so far inapp purchases made in app working since i'm recieving matched purchase bundle matched paylaod.

when purchase via promo code,

  1. i'm recieving matched purchase bundle inapp product
  2. empty developerpayload.

since i'm having above 2 checks every inapp prodcut, verification failed @ validating developers payload.

after research came know that,

when promo code used in-app purchase (the purchases_updated intent) bypass purchase flow app can't supply "developerpayload", used remote verification.

https://github.com/googlesamples/android-play-billing/issues/7

  1. if promo code purchase, can't receive "developerpayload"?
  2. if ans not question (1), there way differentiate if purchase happend "normal" or "promo code" purchase?
  3. if ans not question (2), should skip check validating developerpayload? , if there way differentiate, that?
  4. what way google providing skip developers payload if promo code purchase?


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

sequelize.js - Sequelize group by with association includes id -

-
so when requesting group sequelize follows: return models.workingcalendar .findall({ attributes: [ 'workingcalendar.periodid', 'workingcalendar.date', 'period.name' ], include: [ { model: models.period, attributes: [] } ], where: { getsudoid: currentgetsudo.id, unitplantid: unitplantid }, group: ['workingcalendar.periodid', 'workingcalendar.date', 'period.name'], }); sequelize run query: select [workingcalendar].[id], [workingcalendar].[periodid], [workingcalendar].[date], [period].[name] [workingcalendars] [workingcalendar] left outer join [periods] [period] on [wor...
Read more

java - Android raising EPERM (Operation not permitted) when attempting to send UDP packet after network connection -

-
when responding supplicant_state_changed_action broadcast , attempting send udp packet, exception: java.net.socketexception: sendto failed: eperm (operation not permitted) @ libcore.io.iobridge.maybethrowaftersendto(iobridge.java:542) @ libcore.io.iobridge.sendto(iobridge.java:511) @ java.net.plaindatagramsocketimpl.send(plaindatagramsocketimpl.java:184) @ java.net.datagramsocket.send(datagramsocket.java:305) @ com.mycompany.app.serviceclass.discover(serviceclass.java:355)at com.mycompany.app.serviceclass.access$600(serviceclass.java:39) @ com.mycompany.app.serviceclass$statemachine.run(serviceclass.java:242) @ java.lang.thread.run(thread.java:818) caused by: android.system.errnoexception: sendto failed: eperm (operation not permitted) @ libcore.io.posix.sendtobytes(native method) @ libcore.io.posix.sendto(posix.java:211) @ libcore.io.blockguardos.sendto(blockguardos.java:278) @ libcore.io.iobridge.sendto(iobridge.java:509) @ java.net.plaindat...
Read more

c++ - Migration from QScriptEngine to QJSEngine -

-
i'm migrating qscriptengine code on qjsengine. now, have: class pars { public: static qscriptvalue printmainlog(qscriptcontext* c, qscriptengine* e); }; qscriptvalue pars::printmainlog(qscriptcontext* c, qscriptengine* e) { //some actions return e->globalobject().property(""); } ... qscriptengine engine; ... engine.globalobject().setproperty("printlog",engine.newfunction(pars::printmainlog)); so, user can put printlog("what ever"); in application in , example, qlineedit , function pars::printmainlog evalute. is there way qjsengine? so, user put same printlog("what ever");? way find here , user should put logger.printlog("what ever"); logger class inherited qobject printlog slot.
Read more